In an earlier series of posts I wrote about how income
support payment rates are indexed, using the September 2012 indexation round as
an example. Calculations for the next
round of increases will kick off on 23 January when the Australian Bureau of
Statistics (the ABS) releases the CPI figure for the December 2012 quarter. This is the starting point for working out
the rates that will apply from 20 March 2013.
However, this time round the indexation process will differ
from the standard arrangement described in my earlier posts. That’s because part of the rate increase that
would usually flow from increases in the CPI (and also the pensioner and
beneficiary living cost index – PBLCI - for most pensioners) is going to be siphoned
off to help form a new income support rate component – the clean energy
supplement.
The basic idea is to take out of the CPI (and PBLCI) the
part of the indexation increase that the Treasury attributes to the effect of
carbon pricing and make it a separate payment, along with a 1% “bonus”. The carbon price is assumed to have added
0.7% to the CPI, so when this is added to the 1% bonus the new clean energy
supplement is going to be, roughly speaking, 1.7% of the income support
payment. This summary of the Bill that
introduced the change gives more background to that process,
or you might want to check out the Explanatory Memorandum for the Bill.
Not all payments will get the clean energy supplement as
part of the 20 March changes. Family
payments will pick it up from 1 July, with youth allowance and Austudy payment
not being affected until 1 January 2014.
So, how much will this clean energy supplement (CES)
be? The actual amounts can’t be
calculated until the CPI (and PBLCI) is released. However, the TD
Securities-Melbourne Institute inflation figure released today has an estimated
0.3% increase in the CPI for the December quarter. Based on that estimate (and assuming I’ve
managed to follow the legislation correctly!) the CES amounts should be pretty
close to the figures in the table below.
Payment
|
CES (fortnightly)
|
partnered pension*
|
10.00
|
single pension*
|
13.30
|
parenting payment single
|
11.40
|
parenting payment partnered
|
7.60
|
Newstart allowance single (lower
rate)
|
8.50
|
Newstart allowance single (higher
rate)
|
9.20
|
Newstart allowance partnered
|
7.60
|
* pension CES amounts may also be affected by the PBLCI
These changes to the way the indexation will work on 20 March
mean that it will be important to ensure comparisons between, for example,
Newstart allowance rates at various points in time also include the CES
amounts for 20 March onward. If not, then it will appear
that the non-pension income support payments (like Newstart) have fallen in
value relative to the CPI, when in fact the total package will have increased
in real (CPI adjusted) terms due to the 1% bonus.The following table shows how the rates of selected income support payments would have changed if the standard CPI method had been applied, compared with the CES adjusted method.
You can see that the maximum basic rates under the March CPI system are lower than they would have otherwise have been, but that the overall increase including the CES is higher.
Comparisons across time can be tricky, and have just become even more so!
Great work..I wonder if the MTAWE is going to be published somewhere.It was $1285.10 for september 2012 pension purposes but as of 1 march 2013(for 20 march 2013 pension purposes )is nowhere to be seen.
ReplyDeletethe bureau of stats was to release on 28 february 2013????
The MTAWE figure is available on the Australian Bureau of Statistics website (here: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6302.0/ ). The March 20 rates have also been released (via the pdf here: http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/about-fahcsia/benefits-payments/indexation-rates-march-2013 )
ReplyDeleteAny News on September 2013 pension increases? As of 4 September no news I can see.
ReplyDeleteYou can get them here: http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/about-fahcsia/benefits-payments/indexation-rates-september-2013
ReplyDeleteCheers
David
Great ppost thank you
ReplyDelete